Structured addressing method for wireless networks

ABSTRACT

Logical addresses are assigned to nodes in a wireless network from an address space defined as an n-dimensional grid, where intersections have coordinates of the nodes. A component of the coordinates is selected to be associated with a predetermined value. A parent node assigns an unallocated logical address to a child node joining the network such that any component of the child node address is modified, by one, from a corresponding component of the parent node if the selected component of the parent node has the predetermined value. Otherwise, the unallocated logical address is assigned such that the selected component of the child node address is modified by one from the selected component of the parent node.

RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a Continuation-in-Part of U.S. patent applicationSer. No. 11/199,625, entitled “Structured Addressing Scheme for WirelessNetworks,” and filed by Bhatti et al. on Aug. 9, 2005.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to networks, and more particularly toassigning addresses to nodes in wireless networks.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

The latest advances in wireless networks have enabled applications suchas home and industrial automation; environment monitoring and sensing,security and surveillance; human and goods tracking; and medicalmonitoring.

In a wireless network, each node can communicate with other nodes thatare within transmission range. Each node has a unique identity tofacilitate communication among the nodes. Address assignment in an adhoc network is a problem due to the irregular and spontaneous nature ofthe network topology.

Some addressing schemes, such as the one used by the ZigBee Alliance,use a hierarchical tree of addresses. For example, a ZigBee coordinator(ZC) node initially has control over all allocated addresses.Subsequently, a parent node, beginning with the ZC node, allocates aportion of its address space to a child node when the child node joinsnetwork. Because the number of child nodes for any parent node is fixedas a configuration parameter, it is possible to systematically determinethe portions of the address space that is allocated to a joining childnode. That facilitates route discovery without explicit route discoveryvia broadcast messages.

However, the static structure of the ZigBee scheme can waste addresses,or even deny some parent nodes from assigning addresses to potentialchild nodes. In addition, there is a restriction on the maximum numberof levels that the addressing tree can have in the network. Furthermore,a failure of a single node can make nodes with addresses lower in thetree inaccessible. This is a serious problem when the failed node isnear the root of the tree.

Another addressing scheme uses a distributed dynamic address assignmentprotocol, S. Nesargi and R. Prakash, “MANETconf: Configuration of Hostsin a Mobile Ad Hoc Network,” Proceedings of IEEE Infocom, June 2002. Theprotocol is based on a mutual exclusion process based on theRicart-Agrawala algorithm, G. Ricart and A. K. Agrawala, “An optimalalgorithm for mutual exclusion in computer networks,” Comm. ACM, 24(1),pp. 9-17, 1981. A joining node selects a neighboring node as aninitiator node. The initiator node selects an address and broadcasts amessage to notify all other nodes in the network of the selectedaddress. Then, the initiator node waits for responses from the othernodes in the network. If the responses from all of the nodes arepositive, meaning no other node is using the selected address, then theinitiator node assign this address to the joining node. Otherwise, theinitiator node selects another address, and so forth.

However, there are several problems with that protocol. All nodes mustmaintain information about the allocated addresses. This requiresmemory, which is a limited resource in small sensor nodes. In addition,the broadcast messages and other management messages consume networkresources such as bandwidth and power. Moreover, the initiator node canselect any address. Therefore, the address assignment does notnecessarily follow a regular or systematic pattern. This makes routediscovery a problem.

Another addressing scheme uses a binary split algorithm, M. Mohsin andR. Prakash, “IP Address Assignment in a Mobile Ad Hoc Network,” IEEEMilitary Communications Conference (MILCOM 2002), volume 2, pp. 856-861,October 2002. Each node maintains a block of available addresses. When anode wants to join the network, the joining node requests an addressfrom a neighboring configuring node. The configuring node splits theblock into two halves, and retains one half for itself and gives theother half to the requesting node. Every node maintains an address tableto record the blocks of addresses. Each node also broadcastsperiodically its block of addresses to enable other nodes to updatetheir address tables. Addresses can also be ‘borrowed’ from other nodes.That scheme also leads to an address assignment that does not follow aregular or systematic pattern.

Another scheme performs duplicate address detection, C. E. Perkins, J.T. Malinen, R. Wakikawa, E. M. Belding-Royer, and Y. Sun, “IP AddressAutoconfiguration for Ad Hoc Networks,” IETF Internet Draft,draft-ietf-manet-autoconf-01.txt, November 2001. A joining node selectstwo random addresses for itself, each from a different group ofavailable addresses. One address is used as a temporary source addressfor a verification process. The other address is intended for a finaladdress assignment, pending the verification process. That scheme alsorequires a large number of broadcast messages, and addresses aregenerated randomly.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

Provided is a method for assigning addresses to nodes in a wirelesscommunications network. The method can be used for ad hoc networks,sensor networks, mesh networks, multi-hop networks, and other networks.

The method has a low overhead for memory and broadcast requirements.There are no restrictions on the maximum number of hops, or the numberof parent-child node relationships. The method limits the waste ofaddress space when the physical location of the nodes is not uniformlydistributed.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a grid of nodes and corresponding addresses in a Cartesiancoordinate space according to an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 2 is grid showing multiple routes;

FIG. 3 is a grid of nodes and corresponding addresses in a Cartesiancoordinate space according to an embodiment of the invention;

FIG. 4 is a grid of nodes and a corresponding sequence of addresses in aCartesian coordinate space according to another embodiment of theinvention; and

FIG. 5 is a flow diagram of a method for assigning addresses to nodes ina wireless network according to an embodiment of the invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

FIG. 1 shows an example n-dimensional grid 100 of nodes, where n is 2,in a wireless network according to an embodiment of our invention. Eachintersection of the grid has Cartesian coordinates, e.g., (0, 0), (0,1), . . . (4, 4). The coordinates of the nodes or n-tuples are logicaladdresses of corresponding nodes. The coordinates have a number ofcomponents that is equal to the dimensionality of the grid. For example,in two dimensions, each logical address has two components.

A range of values for each component is expressed by the number of bitsthat are assigned to the component. For example, if a full address isspecified by 16 bits, then each component can be assigned 8 bits forvalues in a range [0, 255]. Alternatively, the assignment can be 6 and10 bits, and so forth. In other words, the grids can be a cube,rectangular or a higher order parallelepiped. Additional dimensions canalso be used, e.g., in four dimensions the coordinates of the nodes are(k, l, m, n).

A ‘corner’ node 1 can be a coordinator node with a logical address (0,0). Stippled nodes 2-3 have assigned addresses. Cross-hatched node 4 isrequesting an address. It should be noted that address assignment canstart at any corner node.

If each address component is allocated 8 bits, then the four corneraddresses are (0x0, 0x0), (0x0, 0xFF), (0xFF, 0x0), and (0xFF, 0xFF). Wehave selected (0x0, 0x0) as the starting address as a matter ofconvenience.

An unallocated logical address is assigned to a child node joining thenetwork by having the child node first broadcast an address requestmessage. In a ZigBee network, this can be a ‘beacon request’ message.All potential parent nodes within transmission range reply by sending abeacon frame to the requesting node. That frame contains anidentification of the sender in addition to some extra information. Thechild node selects one of the replying potential parent nodes as theparent node. The selection can consider the compactness of the logicaladdress space or the signal strength of the responding node.

The selected parent node then assigns a child node address to thejoining child node as follows. The value of one component of the childnode address is made one larger than the corresponding component of theparent node. For example, if the address of the parent node N₁ is (0,0), then the address of the joining child node N₂ can be (0x1, 0x0) or(0x0, 0x1).

Other nodes that can possibly assign the same address at a later timeare notified of the address assignment. For example, in FIG. 1, bothnodes 2 and 3 can assign the same address to node 4. If node 2 assignsfirst, then node 3 is informed by node 2 that the address (1, 1) hasbeen allocated to node 4.

In one embodiment of the invention, the assignment order can beaccording to a predetermined indexing scheme of the coordinatecomponents. For example, the first component is incremented before thesecond component. Thus, the ordering can cause the addresses to beuniformly distributed.

It should be noted, that the selected addressing order also impliespossible routing between any two nodes. In addition, unlike thetree-structured routing of ZigBee, which only has one path to aparticular node, our addressing scheme allows multiple paths 21-23, asshown in FIG. 2. Thus, the network, as a whole, is not affected by afailure of a single node. In fact, the network can continue to functioneven with multiple failed nodes, particularly if the number ofdimensions of the grid is relatively high.

Address Clashes

Address clashes, where other nodes can assign to the joining child nodeaddress, can be avoided as described above, i.e., when an address isassigned to a joining child node by the selected parent node, othernodes that can possibly assign the same address at a later time arenotified of the address assignment. However, the need to notify othernodes causes additional overhead to the system.

In one embodiment, addresses are assigned to child nodes according to aselected component of the coordinates associated with a predeterminedvalue. A parent node can assign an unallocated logical address as achild node address such that any component of the child node address ismodified, by one, from a corresponding component of the parent node ifthe selected component of the parent node has the predetermined value.Otherwise, the parent node assigns the child node an unallocated logicaladdress as a child node address such that the selected component of thechild node address is modified, by one, from the selected component ofthe parent node.

FIG. 3 shows n-dimensional grid 300 of nodes, where n is 2, in awireless network according to an embodiment of our invention. It shouldbe understood that the invention is not limited to two dimensions. Here,the first component is the selected component and the predeterminedvalue is zero (0). Therefore, coordinator node 301 at [0,0], acting as aparent node, can assign [1,0] 302 or [0,1] 303 as a child node address,because the selected component of the coordinator node, i.e., the firstcomponent, has the predetermined value (0). The same is true for aparent node at address [0,1] 303. Since the selected component has thepredetermined value, the parent node at [0,1] can assign to [1,1] 304,or [0,2] 305, or [0,0], 301, if [0,0] is available, i.e., if thecoordinator node has different coordinates and [0,0] is an unallocatedlogical address.

On the other hand, a parent node at [1,0] 302, or [1,1] 304, or [1,2]306, can only assign an unallocated logical address as a child nodeaddress such that the selected component of the child node address ismodified, by one, from the selected component of the parent node. So aparent node at (1,0) 302, can only assign an address that modifies theselected component, i.e., the first component, by one, which would be(2,0) or (0,0), if available.

It should be noted that this addressing method can be represented as atree.

It is possible to define many different addressing schemes by includingadditional conditions on the embodiment described above. For example, aset of components can be selected and associated with a singlepredetermined value, or each select component of the set can beassociated with a different predetermined value. In short, a set ofselected components can be associated with a set of predeterminedvalues, where either or both sets can be one. For example, as shown inFIG. 4, it is possible use the method for assigning addresses accordingto the invention using sets of components and predetermined values toassign addresses beginning at a coordinator node 401 in a spiral pattern402, without address clashes or a need to notify other nodes of addressassignments.

Although the invention has been described by way of examples ofpreferred embodiments, it is to be understood that various otheradaptations and modifications may be made within the spirit and scope ofthe invention. Therefore, it is the object of the appended claims tocover all such variations and modifications as come within the truespirit and scope of the invention. Logical addresses 531 are assigned tonodes in a wireless network 501 from an address space defined 510 as ann-dimensional grid 502, where intersections have coordinates of thenodes. A component 521 of the coordinates is selected to be associatedwith a predetermined value. A parent node assigns 530 an unallocatedlogical address to a child node joining the network such that anycomponent of the child node address is modified, by one, from acorresponding component of the parent node if the selected component ofthe parent node has the predetermined value 503. Otherwise, theunallocated logical address is assigned such that the selected componentof the child node address is modified by one from the selected componentof the parent node.

1. A method for assigning addresses to nodes in a wireless network,comprising: defining an address space as an n-dimensional grid, eachgrid intersection having coordinates of a corresponding possible node ofa wireless network, a number of components of each coordinate beingequal to a dimensionality of the grid, and the coordinates forming alogical address of the corresponding possible node; selecting acomponent of the coordinates to be associated with a predeterminedvalue; assigning, by a parent node to a child node joining the wirelessnetwork, an unallocated logical address as a child node address suchthat any component of the child node address is modified, by one, from acorresponding component of the parent node if the selected component ofthe parent node has the predetermined value; and otherwise assigning, bythe parent node to the child node joining the wireless network, anunallocated logical address as a child node address such that theselected component of the child node address is modified, by one, fromthe selected component of the parent node.
 2. The method of claim 1,wherein a set of components is selected to be associated with a set ofpredetermined values.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein a range ofpossible values of each component is determined by a number of bits usedto express the component.
 4. The method of claim 1, in which the grid isin a form of a parallelepiped.
 5. The method of claim 1, furthercomprising: assigning coordinates of a corner of the grid as the logicaladdress of a coordinator node of the network.
 6. The method of claim 1,further comprising: broadcasting, by the child node, an address requestmessage; replying to the broadcast request message by one or morepotential parent nodes; and selecting, in the child node, one of thepotential parent nodes as the parent node.
 7. The method of claim 1, inwhich the selecting is based on a signal strength of the replying nodes.8. The method of claim 1, in which the logical address implies a routebetween the nodes.